Tue. May. 13, 2008
IBM blogger Elizabeth took the time to write about our stylish pink notebooks and went on to make the point that for servers, what really matters, is on the inside. Especially benchmarks and she cites VMmark specifically.
We couldn't agree more.
VMmark is a valuable tool to determine the performance of different hardware and virtualization platforms. Congrats, at the time she posted the IBM System x3850 was the #1 in this benchmark.
As fashion is wont to do - now there is a new #1. Can you guess the new "it" model for this issue???
Check out the Stats: TOP 4-SOCKET PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR VMMARK AS OF MAY 7, 2008
| Vendor |
SystemVMware version |
VMmark (v 1.0)Score |
Processors |
PublishDate |
ConfigurationPrice |
| Dell |
PowerEdge R900VMware ESX v3.5 |
14.23 @ 10 tiles |
Intel Xeon X7350 |
May 2008 |
$28,802 |
| Dell |
PowerEdge R905VMware ESX v3.5 |
14.17 @ 10 tiles |
AMD Opteron8360 SE |
May 2008 |
$23,135 |
| IBM |
IBM System x3850 M2VMware ESX v3.5 |
13.16 @ 9 tiles |
Intel Xeon X7350 |
Mar 2008 |
$30,729 |
| Sun |
Sun Fire X4450VMware ESX v3.5 |
12.23 @ 8 tiles |
Intel Xeon X7350 |
Apr 2008 |
$36,176 |
| HP |
HP ProLiant DL580 G5VMware ESX v3.0.2 |
11.54 @ 8 tiles |
Intel Xeon X7350 |
Aug 2007 |
$27,330 |
- Both results for the PowerEdge R900 and R905 beat the previous #1, the IBM x3850 M2, by more than a full point (8%) in the overall score (which represents how well the VMs are performing).
- Dell's results show that we're more than just "pretty in pink". The PowerEdge R905, in addition to beating the IBM result by 8%, costs 25% less (and 36% less than Sun).
- The same day this benchmark posted we had a major virtualization announcement - some external perspectives are here, here and here.
The fashion world just keeps spinning ‘round....